Alternative currency and balanced living system. Alternativna valuta i uravnoteženi životni sistem. Moneta alternativa e sistema di vita equilibrato.



Home Mediji Vijesti

Crom Alternative News

Your new independent and alternative online news source, provides world news that matters, a place where you can publish your own news.
Ocjena: / 5
13th July. 2009, By Bret Burquest

Isn’t it interesting how all our problems seem to be global these days. A global war on terrorism, a global economic crisis, the need for a global currency, global trade, global health concerns, global warming, etc.

It’s almost as if someone is pushing for a one-world government, with a one-world monetary system, a one-world police force, a one-world set of rules and a population of obedient worker bees to keep the whole economic engine going at full throttle.

Except for the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, Pindar, powerful international bankers, Skull and Bones, global elitist power brokers, the Military-Industrial Complex, the CIA, the KGB, the Federal Reserve, the international Communist conspiracy, the Knights of Malta, the Club of Rome, the 13 ruling families of the Illuminati (Rothschild, Bruce, Cavendish, De Medici, Hanover, Hapsburg, Krupp, Plantagenet, Rockefeller, Romanov, Sinclair, Warburg, Windsor) and the ghost of Adam Weishaupt, I can’t imagine who would have a motive to create a one-world government and slither their way to the top of the pyramid of power to rule the world.

Global problems, such as global warming, require global solutions.

However, global warming is a myth, perpetrated by various factions that seek to control planet Earth and carried out by the fools who fall for such blatant nonsense.

The surface temperature of Earth has only changed slightly more than one degree Fahrenheit over the last century. Plus, the planet has cycled through ice ages and warm periods many times without human interference.

Steven Milloy has a B.A. in Natural Science and an M.S. in Biostatistics from Johns Hopkins University, and a Juris Doctorate from George Washington University. He was on the judging panel for the American Association for the Advancement of Science Awards and has testified before the U.S. Congress on environmental issues.

Milloy refers to the global warming controversy as the “mother of all junk science.” He contends that climate varies naturally and the ongoing climate change is within the natural variation.

The Kyoto Protocol is an agreement among nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 8 percent, from the 1990 levels, by 2012. The USA and most of the European Union signatories have been ignoring it.

A Russian study showed that the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is approximately 370 PPM (parts per million) and compliance with Kyoto would result in a difference of only one or two PPM by 2012.

Using data provided by those who promote the Kyoto Protocol, if every country complied with the agreement, the average global temperature would be reduced by 0.0015 degrees Centigrade. At this rate, it would take 667 years (and a cost of $100 trillion) to hypothetically forestall global warming by one degree Centigrade.

That’s correct — it will cost $100 trillion to alter the global climate by one degree over a period of 667 years.

Ironically, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 25 percent of methane emissions into the atmosphere come from livestock. Globally that’s 100 million tons of methane annually.

In 2006, Al Gore recently flew (round trip on a private airplane) from his Tennessee mansion to Hollywood, and was chauffeured around in a stretch limousine, where he accepted an Academy Award for his documentary film, AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH, which warns of the dangers of global warning and criticizes excessive usage of fossil fuels.

Not only did Gore once proclaim to have invented the Internet, but his film is also filled with exaggeration.

Gore claims virtually all scientists blame humans for global warming when in fact there are vast differences among scientists, including more and more every day who believe global warming is a sham.. Not surprisingly, those scientists who believe in global warming are those who have large government grants to study the issue whereby findings of global warming yields more grants to study the problem further.

Gore claims global warming would raise sea levels 20 feet when 23 inches is the correct amount. He claims polar bears are on the decline but the opposite is true. He fabricated historical temperatures. And so on.

The documentary shows some glaciers that are receding but fails to even mention that other glaciers are actually growing as well. Also, certain glaciers in Alaska have been receding ever since famous outdoor photographer John Muir photographed them back in the 1800s, long before the onset of manmade greenhouse emissions.

The documentary also implies that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide have historically preceded increases in global temperatures. However, a 2005 study in the journal SCIENCE reports that the opposite may have been true in the past — that higher temperatures may actually precede increased carbon dioxide levels.

There are many non-human causes for global temperature changes. There has been a sharp increase in volcanoes under the oceans, increases in solar activity, complex ocean currents that control local weather systems and many other factors.

Plus, there has actually been a cooling trend since 1998.

With Al Gore, exaggeration and hypocrisy go hand in hand.

Gore’s main residence, a 10,000 sq. ft. mansion in Nashville, has 20 rooms, including 8 bathrooms. While urging Americans to “conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home,” his home devoured 221,000 kilowatt-hours in 2006, compared to the average American who consumes 10,656 kilowatts-hours per year.

Al and Tipper Gore also have a 4,000 sq. ft. home in Arlington, Va., and a third home in Carthage, Tenn.

But the former Vice President has a trick up his sleeve that will excuse him from any harmful environmental excesses. It’s a scheme involving “carbon credits” and it would make most professional flimflam artists blush.

Carbon credits are trendy items invented by global warming bullies ostensibly to help the environment. When Gore flies a plane or drives his SUV, he purchases carbon credits. In turn, whoever sold the carbon credits then applies a portion of the proceeds (after expenses) toward some sort of environmental project. Thus, buyers of carbon credits will remain “carbon neutral” since they create a balance between producing and reducing carbon.

Eager to help the environment, Gore buys his carbon credits from Generation Investment Management, LLP, a private, owner-managed partnership, with offices in London and Washington, D.C., established in 2004.

Surprise, surprise — Gore is the founding partner and chairman of Generation Investment Management, LLP.

In other words, he lives an opulent lifestyle, emitting oodles of carbon, and pays for his excesses by buying carbon credits from his own company, thereby easing his conscience of polluting the planet while turning a profit on the side. He basically writes a check to himself and acts like a hero while alarming the world of pending doom.

Surprise, surprise — all Academy Award nominees in 2006 received a bundle of prepaid carbon credits in their goody bags. In Hollywood, it’s called concern for the environment. In the real world, it’s called marketing.

Worldwide carbon credit sales rose from $6 million in 2004 to $110 million in 2006. Lacking government oversight, there’s no visibility on overhead or environmental value.

And the Global Warming express rolls on.


Ocjena: / 4
Jul 20.2009,  My Way News

The White House is being forced to acknowledge the wide gap between its once-upbeat predictions about the economy and today's bleak landscape.

The administration's annual midsummer budget update is sure to show higher deficits and unemployment and slower growth than projected in President Barack Obama's budget in February and update in May, and that could complicate his efforts to get his signature health care and global-warming proposals through Congress.

The release of the update - usually scheduled for mid-July - has been put off until the middle of next month, giving rise to speculation the White House is delaying the bad news at least until Congress leaves town on its August 7 summer recess.

The administration is pressing for votes before then on its $1 trillion health care initiative, which lawmakers are arguing over how to finance.

The White House budget director, Peter Orszag, said on Sunday that the administration believes the "chances are high" of getting a health care bill by then. But new analyses showing runaway costs are jeopardizing Senate passage.

"Instead of a dream, this routine report could be a nightmare," Tony Fratto, a former Treasury Department official and White House spokesman under President George W. Bush, said of the delayed budget update. "There are some things that can't be escaped."

The administration earlier this year predicted that unemployment would peak at about 9 percent without a big stimulus package and 8 percent with one. Congress did pass a $787 billion two-year stimulus measure, yet unemployment soared to 9.5 percent in June and appears headed for double digits.

Obama's current forecast anticipates 3.2 percent growth next year, then 4 percent or higher growth from 2011 to 2013. Private forecasts are less optimistic, especially for next year.

Any downward revision in growth or revenue projections would mean that budget deficits would be far higher than the administration is now suggesting.

Setting the stage for bleaker projections, Vice President Joe Biden recently conceded, "We misread how bad the economy was" in January. Obama modified that by suggesting the White House had "incomplete" information.

The new budget update comes as the public and members of Congress are becoming increasingly anxious over Obama's economic policies.

A Washington Post-ABC News survey released Monday shows approval of Obama's handling of health-care reform slipping below 50 percent for the first time. The poll also found support eroding on how Obama is dealing with other issues that are important to Americans right now - the economy, unemployment and the swelling budget deficit.

The Democratic-controlled Congress is reeling from last week's testimony by the head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf, that the main health care proposals Congress is considering would not reduce costs - as Obama has insisted - but "significantly expand" the federal financial responsibility for health care.

That gave ammunition to Republican critics of the bill.

Late last week, Obama vowed anew that "health insurance reform cannot add to our deficit over the next decade and I mean it."

The nation's debt - the total of accumulated annual budget deficits - now stands at $11.6 trillion. In the scheme of things, that's more important than talking about the "deficit," which only looks at a one-year slice of bookkeeping and totally ignores previous indebtedness that is still outstanding.

Even so, the administration has projected that the annual deficit for the current budget year will hit $1.84 trillion, four times the size of last year's deficit of $455 billion. Private forecasters suggest that shortfall may actually top $2 trillion.

The administration has projected that the annual deficit for the current budget year will hit $1.84 trillion, four times the size of last year's deficit of $455 billion. Private forecasters suggest that shortfall may top $2 trillion.

If a higher deficit and lower growth numbers are not part of the administration's budget update, that will lead to charges that the White House is manipulating its figures to offer too rosy an outlook - the same criticism leveled at previous administrations.

The midsession review by the White House's Office of Management and Budget will likely reflect weaker numbers. But where is it?

White House officials say it is now expected in mid-August. They blame the delay on the fact that this is a transition year between presidencies and note that Obama didn't release his full budget until early May - instead of the first week in February, when he put out just an outline.

Still, the update mainly involves plugging in changes in economic indicators, not revising program-by-program details. And indicators such as unemployment and gross domestic product changes have been public knowledge for some time.

Standard & Poor's chief economist David Wyss said part of the problem with the administration's earlier numbers is that "they were just stale," essentially put together by budget number-crunchers at the end of last year, before the sharp drop in the economy.

Wyss, like many other economists, says he expects the recession to last at least until September or October. "We're looking for basically a zero second half (of 2009). And then sluggish recovery," he said.

Orszag, making the rounds of Sunday talk shows, insisted the economy at the end of last year, which the White House used for its optimistic budget forecasts, "was weaker at that time than anyone anticipated." He cited a "sense of free fall" not fully recognized at the time.

"It's going to take time to work our way out of it," the White House budget director told "Fox News Sunday."

Even as it prepares to put larger deficit and smaller growth figures into its official forecast, the administration is looking for signs of improvement.

"If we were at the brink of catastrophe at the beginning of the year, we have walked some substantial distance back from the abyss," said Lawrence Summers, Obama's chief economic adviser.
Ocjena: / 3

20. Luglio 2009, Wall Street Italia

La crisi finanziaria americana potrebbe costare 23.700 miliardi di dollari: questa la cifra per il Governo statunitense relativa agli sforzi fatti per fare uscire il Paese dalla recessione peggiore dagli anni Trenta.

Nella testimonianza alla commissione supervisione e riforme della Camera, le cui anticipazioni sono state ottenute dal Wall Street Journal, l'ispettore generale Neil Barofsky dovrebbe spiegare domani che cifre di questo genere includono le spese per le agenzie coinvolte nella gestione dei programmi varati a sostegno del sistema finanziario.

Duro il commento di Darrell Issa, repubblicano a capo della commissione, secondo cui 23.700 miliardi è una cifra "sbalorditiva".
Il deputato della California ha commentato dicendo che "se si spende un milione di dollari al giorno per ogni anno dalla nascita di Cristo ad oggi, non si arriva neppure a 1.000 miliardi di dollari".

Misuratore Del Debito Degli Stati Uniti d'America
Ocjena: / 2

20 Srpanj 2009,  Bloomberg

Američke porezne obveznike možda čeka lomača od $23,7 trilijuna dolara za podupiranje gospodarstva i spašavanje financijskih kompanija, izjavio je Neil Barofsky (special inspector general for the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program).

$700 milijardi dolara investicijskog programa za banke, pruženih od Trezora Sjedinjenih Američkih Država predstavlja samo mali dio od sveukupnih federalnih podrški za oživljavanje financijskog sustava SAD-a, uključujući i $6,8 trilijuna dolara pomoći koje su pružile Federalne Rezerve, izjavio je Barofsky u današnjem izvještaju.

"TARP je evoluirao u program koji nema povijesnog primjera po cilju, obimu i složenosti", rekao je u Barofsky u svjedočanstvu pripremljenom za raspravu sutra pred Odborom Doma Za Vladine Reforme I Nadzor.

Troškovi uključuju $2,3 trilijuna dolara u programima ponuđenim od Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., $7,4 trilijuna dolara u TARP-u i drugim pomoćima iz Državnog Trezora i $7,2 trilijuna dolara u federalnom novcu za Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Kreditne Unije, Branitelje i druge poslove iz federalnih programa, rekao je Barofsky.

Barofsky je kritizirao zasebno kvartalno izvješće Trezora o provedbi TARP-a, izjavivši da je Trezor uzastopno propuštao usvojiti savjete potrebne za osiguranje transparentnosti i ispunjavanje cilja Administracije za provedbu TARP-a uz najviši stupanj odgovornosti.

Kao rezultat toga, porezni obveznici ne znaju kako primatelji TARP-a koriste novac ili vrijednosna ulaganja, kazao je u izvješću.

Trezor je do sada potrošio $441 milijardi dolara od TARP sredstava i isplanirao novih $202,1 milijardi dolara za drugu potrošnju.

U devet mjeseci od kako je Kongres odobrio TARP program, Trezor je napravio 12 programa sa sredstvima koja mogu dostići skoro $3 trilijuna dolara, izjavio je Barofsky.

Nacionalni Dužnički Sat Sjedinjenih Američkih Država
Ocjena: / 3

July 20. 2009, Bloomberg

U.S. taxpayers may be on the hook for as much as $23.7 trillion to bolster the economy and bail out financial companies, said Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The Treasury’s $700 billion bank-investment program represents a fraction of all federal support to resuscitate the U.S. financial system, including $6.8 trillion in aid offered by the Federal Reserve, Barofsky said in a report released today.

“TARP has evolved into a program of unprecedented scope, scale and complexity,” Barofsky said in testimony prepared for a hearing tomorrow before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Costs include $2.3 trillion in programs offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., $7.4 trillion in TARP and other aid from the Treasury and $7.2 trillion in federal money for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, credit unions, Veterans Affairs and other federal programs, he said.

Barofsky offered criticism in a separate quarterly report of Treasury’s implementation of TARP, saying the department has “repeatedly failed to adopt recommendations” needed to provide transparency and fulfill the administration’s goal to implement TARP “with the highest degree of accountability.”

As a result, taxpayers don’t know how TARP recipients are using the money or the value of the investments, he said in the report.

The Treasury has spent $441 billion of TARP funds so far and has allocated $202.1 billion more for other spending.

In the nine months since Congress authorized TARP, Treasury has created 12 programs involving funds that may reach almost $3 trillion, Barofsky said.

US National Debt Clock
Ocjena: / 1

Marc Faber je legendarni investicijski analitičar rođen u Zürich-u, Švicarska.

Postao je poznat širom planete savjetujući svoje klijente da napuste pozicije na tržištu dionica, tjedan dana prije velikog sloma u Listopadu 1987 godine.

Ocjena: / 3

July 18 2009, Times Online

Britain was accused yesterday of dumping toxic household and industrial waste in developing countries on two continents in breach of an international convention.

The Government last night was considering tightening the enforcement of rules after the discovery of hazardous medical and electrical waste in Brazil and Ghana.

Ocjena: / 7

EU agriculture subsidies worth billions of pounds under the CAP are being paid out to businesses and multinational corporations with little connection to traditional farming.

18 Jul 2009, Daily Telegraph 

Ocjena: / 3

Od dionica tehničke industrije do visokih cijena goriva, banka Goldman Sachs je osmislila svaku veću manipulaciju tržišta još od vremena Velike Depresije i upravo se sprema  to ponovno uraditi.

13 Srpanj 2009,

The Great American Bubble Machine

Vratimo se malo unazad od danas, na početak Lipnja 2009 godine, u Washington, Sjedinjene Američke Države. Barack Obama, popularan mladi političar u  čijoj je kampanji vodeći privatni donator bila investicijska banka Goldman Sachs sa nekih $ 981.000 dolara, zasjeda u Bijeloj kući. Ploveći kroz politička minska polja u eri financijskih spašavanja bez ijedne ogrebotine, banka Goldman Sachs se opet vratila svom starom biznisu, izviđanju i pronalaženju slabosti novog tržišta kojeg je kreirala vlada uz pomoć novih uspješnih studenata koji su zasjeli na ključne stolice u vladinim poslovima.

Otišli su Hank Paulson i Neel Kashkari. Na njihovim mjestima su sada načelnik stožera trezora Mark Patterson i CFTC šef Gary Gensler, obojica bivši Goldmanovci. Gensler je u Goldman Sachsu bio jedan od velikih šefova financija.
I umjesto kreditnih derivata, opcija futures na naftu ili CDOs (collateralized debt obligations) sa hipotekarnom podlogom, nova igra u gradu, sljedeći balon je od ugljenovih kredita, napuhavajuće tržište od trilijuna dolara koje sada jedva da postoji, ali će eksplodirati ako Demokratska Stranka sa $4.452.585 dolara iz zadnjih izbora uspije progurati u postojanje novu balončinu od roba (commodities), prikrivenu kao "plan za okoliš",a nazvanom cap-and-trade.

Novo carbon-credit tržište je virtualno ponavljanje casino-a robnog tržišta koje je prijalo Goldmanu, sada sa jednim divnim novim naborom: Ako je plan prođe kao što se i očekuje, porasti će cijene zato što je to zahtijevala vlada. Goldman Sachs neće niti morati igrati prljavu igru, igra je unaprijed zamišljena kao prljava.

Evo kako stvar funkcionira: Ako prijedlog zakona prođe, tu će biti ograničenja na iznos godišnje emisije ugljika za one koji rade sa ugljenom, komunalije, distributere prirodnog plina i brojne druge. Ako kompanije prekorače njihove dozvoljene udjele u emisiji ugljika, one će moći kupiti udjele od ostalih tvrtki koje su uspjele emitirati manje emisije ugljika u atmosferu. Predsjednik Obama konzervativno procjenjuje da će oko $646 milijardi dolara vrijednih udjela ugljika, biti ponuđeno na aukcijama u prvih sedam godina. Jedan od njegovih vrhunskih ekonomskih savjetnika procjenjuje da bi stvarna brojka mogla biti dvostruko, ili čak tri puta veća od tog iznosa.

Značajka tog plana koja se posebno odnosi na špekulatore je da će vlada ukupnu količinu udjela dozvoljenog zagađivanja neprestano smanjivati, što znači da će ugljik krediti vremenom postati sve oskudniji. To pak znači da je otvoreno novo tržište roba gdje će glavna roba kojom se trguje garantirano poskupiti s vremenom. Volumen tog novog tržišta će biti veći od $1 triliona dolara godišnje. Za usporedbu, ukupan godišnji prihod svih dobavljača električne energije u Americi iznosi $320 milijardi dolara.

Goldman Sachs želi ovaj zakon. Plan je (1) da se on kao paradigma utemelji u zakonu, (2) osigurati si dio kriške profita na toj paradigmi i (3) osigurati si da će ta kriška profita biti golema. Banka Goldman Sachs je počela gurati cap-and-trade još davno, ali je stvar došla na svoj vrhunac prošle godine kada je banka potrošila $3,5 miliona dolara za lobiranje u klimatskim pitanjima. Jedan od njihovih lobista u to vrijeme je bio nitko drugi nego Patterson, sada zaposlen u državnom tezoru kao "chief of staff".
Povratakom u 2005 godinu, kada je Hank Paulson bio glavešina Goldman Sachs-a, otkriva se da je on osobno pomogao autoru ekološke politike banke.
Taj dokument sadrži neke iznenađujuće elemente za firmu koja se u svim drugim područjima dosljedno protivi bilo kakvim vladinim regulacijama. Paulson-ovo izvješće tvrdi da dobrovoljna akcija sama po sebi ne može riješiti problem klimatskih promjena. Nekoliko godina kasnije, Ken Newcombe, šef pitanja za ugljik u banci Goldman Sachs, inzistirao je da cap-and-trade sam po sebi neće biti dovoljan za rješavanja klimatksih problema i pozvao na daljnja javna ulaganja u istraživanje i razvoj.
Sve je ovo veoma povoljno, imajući u vidu da je banka Goldman Sachs odavno počela ulagati u elektrane na vjetar (kupila je kompaniju "Horizon Wind Energy"), obnovljivi dizel (investitor je u kompaniji "Changing World Technologies") i solarnu energiju (partner je sa s "BP Solar"), točno u one poslove koji će napredovati i uspijevati ako vlada uspije prisiliti proizvođače energije da koriste čistiju energiju. Ovako je rekao Paulson u to vrijeme, "Mi ne radimo te investicije kako bi izgubili novac".

Banka posjeduje 10% udjela u "Chicago Climate Exchange", gdje će se trgovati udjelima ugljenima. Štoviše, Goldman Sachs posjeduje manjinski udio u kompaniji "Blue Source LLC", firmi sa sjedištem u državi Utah koja prodaje karbon kredite baš onog tipa koji će naveliko potraživati ako zakon prođe.
Nobelovac Al Gore, koji je prisno surađivao u planiranju i stvaranju cap-and-trade, otvorio je tvrtku "Generation Investment Management" sa tri bivše glavešine iz Goldman Sachsa. Sada mu društvo prave David Blood, Mark Ferguson i Peter Harris.
Njihovov biznis? Investiranje u financijske papire povezanih sa ugljikom. Postoji također i $500 miliona dolara u "Green Growth Fund" za ulaganje u zelenu tehnologiju... i tako dalje...
Goldman Sachs je opet ispred svih, samo čekajući da zlatna koka snese jaje na pravom mjestu.
Hoće li ovo novo tržište biti većo od energy-futures tržišta?

"Oh, pa energy-futures tržište će ispasti patuljak", kaže bivši član odbora za energiju.

Pa, mogli biste reći, koga je uopće briga? Ako cap-and-trade uspije, nećemo li se svi spasiti od katastrofe globalnog zatopljenja? Možda - ali cap-and-trade, kako je to isplanirala banka Goldman Sachs, je u stvarnosti samo ugljični porez strukturiran na način da privatni interesi pokupe zaradu. Umjesto da vlada jednostavno nametne fiksni porez na zagađenje ugljikom i prisili proizvođače koji koriste nečistu energiju na plaćanje posljedica za nered kojeg čine, cap-and-trade će omogućiti malom, pakleno gramzivom plemenu Wall Street svinja pretvoriti još jedno tržište roba u privatnu shemu ubiranja poreza. Ovo je gore nego nedavno financijsko spašavanje: To omogućuje banci da iskoriste porezni novac prije nego što je čak i prikupili.

"Ako će to biti porez, ja bih radije da ga nametne i ubire Washington", kaže Michael Masters, direktor hedge fonda koji je progovorio protiv špekulacija na naftnim opcijama (oilfutures) . "Ali mi ovdje govorimo da Wall Street može postaviti porez, i da ga Wall Street može ubirati. To je zadnja stvar na svijetu koju želim, toliko glupa."

Cap-and-trade će oživjeti. Ili, ako ne uspije, nešto slično će proći. Govorimo o istom moralu kojeg je banka Goldman Sachs imala u pomaganju kreiranja svih financijskih balona od 1929 do danas.

U skoro svakom slučaju, ista banka koja je bezbrižno nastupala godinama, rušeći sistem s toksičnih kredita i grabežljivim kamatarskim kreditima i dugovima, ostvarujući ništa drugo osim velikih bonusa za nekoliko šefova; je nagrađivana sa planinama besplatnog novca i državnim jamstvima, dok stvarne žrtve ovog nereda, porezni obveznici, sve to plaćaju.

Nije lako prihvatiti stvarnost u kojoj sada rutinski dozvoljamo tim ljudima da se izvuku i to sa čime, postoji neka vrsta kolektivnog poricanja koje se pojavljuje kada zemlja prolazi kroz ono što Amerika prolazi u posljednje vrijeme, kada ljudi gube ugled i status kao što smo ga mi izgubili u posljednjih nekoliko godina.

Ne možete prihvatiti činjenicu da više niste državljanin uspješne i napredne, prve svjetske demokracije, da možete biti opljačkani usred bijela dana, jer kao pri amputaciji, još uvijek možete osjetiti vrste stvari koje više ne postoje.

Ali to je tako. To je svijet u kojem živimo sada. A na ovome svijetu, neki od nas moraju igrati po pravilima, dok su drugi dobili obavijest od ravnatelja da ih je oslobodio od domaćih zadaća za sva vremena i dao im torbu sa $10 milijardi dolara da si kupuju ručak.

Ovo je gangsterska država sa gangsterskom ekonomijom, niti u cijene ne možemo više vjerovati, postoje skriveni porezi u svakom novčiću kojeg morate platiti.

Možda sve ovo i ne možemo zaustaviti, ali bi barem trebali znati u kojem pravcu se krećemo, gdje to sve skupa ide.
Ocjena: / 4

Everything, since June 1933, operates in commerce.

Government has an implied agreement with the STRAWMAN (government's creation) and the STRAWMAN is subject to government rule.

When we, the real flesh and blood man and woman, step into their "process" we become the "surety" for the fictional STRAWMAN.

Ocjena: / 2

Branimir Johny Štulić je još uvijek tu.

Iako još uvijek rado slušamo Marinu, Azre više nema, i sudeći po svemu, nikada je više neće ni biti.


Ocjena: / 2

7/17/2009, MSN Money

Nesmotrenim vezivanjem njihovih bogatstava u borbi za vlastite interese, 2 nacije su se same postavile na ekonomski put sigurnog međusobnog uništenja.

Zamislite da postanete uspješni u svom poslu i da imate 2 trilijuna dolara u prihodima koje umjesto ispod kreveta, ulažete u kratkoročne obveznice Trezora Sjedinjenih Američkih Država na čuvanje.

Sada zamislite da kada pokušate unovčiti te obveznice kako bi kupili nekoliko stvari za vašu djecu, službenik u banci vas potjera napolje i naglo zatvori vrata.


alternative currency, newspapers, novosti, giornali, novine, notizie, local currency, complementary currency, alternativni novac, lokalna valuta, komplementarna valuta, moneta alternativa, moneta complementare, moneta locale      Objavi Vijest

Ako si registrirani korisnik, možeš objaviti svoje vijesti na webu koristeći ovaj servis.

independent news, nezavisne vijesti, informations, informacije, informazioni, kredit, loan, notizie indipendenti, prestito, mutuo, seigniorage, signoraggio    Kategorije Vijesti


 alternative news, alternativne vijesti, notizie alternative, debt-money, moneta debito, central bank, banca centrale, centralna banka, publish news, objavi vijest, pubblica le tue notizie    Prijava

What happens next if the state can go bankrupt?

 alternative news, alternativne vijesti, notizie alternative, money, denaro, soldi, novac, debt, dug, debito, taxes, tasse, porez, bank, banca, banka     Tko Je Online?

Trenutno aktivnih Gostiju: 3135 

 nezavisne vijesti, notizie indipendenti, independent news, informations, informacije, informazioni, kredit, loan, prestito, seigniorage, mutuo, signoraggio     Novo Na Forumu